Are you one of the top 11%?
|
|
Winton Au Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
Department of Psychology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong
|
|
Training & Development is a catchphrase nowadays. As stated in the Chief Executive's 2001 Policy Address last October, the Government has set aside $5 billion to subsidize those with learning aspirations to pursue continuing education and training programmes. We all know that we have to stay competitive by continuously educating ourselves. But do we practice what we preach? According to a survey conducted by the Industrial Psychology Course at the Chinese University of Hong Kong early last year, some people did take up continuing education and training & development vigorously, whereas others only paid lip service.
We interviewed a total of 480
employees above the age of 15 in 2001 according to a quota
sampling scheme. These respondents were selected to match
the demographic characteristics of the year 2000 household
survey sample in terms of sex distribution, industry distribution
and age distribution. The current sample was reasonably representative
of the Hong Kong employee population.
Hours of Participation in
Different Types of Continuing Education & Training Activities
in Six Months
Respondents reported the number of hours of training they
participated in a six-month period since August 2000. The
training method was classified in four major categories: (a)
courses; (b) lectures, workshops, & seminars, (c) on-job-training
& mentoring, and (d) self-study.
Table
1. The average number of hours of participation in different
types of continuing education and training activities
per month. |
|
No.
|
%
|
Mean Hours*
|
Course |
185
|
39%
|
13.6
|
Lecture, seminar, workshop |
109
|
23%
|
4.8
|
On-job
training |
173
|
36%
|
20.3
|
Self-study |
235
|
49%
|
14.6
|
Note: A person can participate
in more than one type of continuing education and training
activities.
* Among respondents who have been participating in
each of the corresponding type of training |
Table 1 shows that about half (49%)
of the respondents have been participating in self-study. The
next popular training type was courses (39%), followed by on-job-training
(36%), and lectures (23%). Among respondents who have been participating
in each of the corresponding type of training, respondents spent
most time on on-job training (an average of 20.3 hours per month),
followed by self-study (14.6 hours/month), courses (13.6 hours/month)
and lectures (4.8 hours/month)
Table
2. Frequency and percentage distribution of participation
in different types of continuing education and training
activities. |
|
No.
|
%
|
Never |
187
|
39%
|
Less than 1 hour per week
|
35
|
7%
|
Between one and six hours
per week |
134
|
28%
|
One hour per
day |
73
|
15%
|
Two or more
hours per day |
54
|
11%
|
Table 2 shows that 39% of the respondents
had not participated in any continuing education or training
activities in the six-month period prior to the survey. 7% of
the respondents spent less than one hour per week in training-related
activities, 28% spent one to six hours per week, 15% spent one
hour per day, and 11% spent two or more hours per day.
Summary and Conclusion
There seems to be two categories
of employees in this sample: (a) a majority did not take part
in any kind of continuing education or training activities,
and (b) among those who did spend time on training, a sizable
portion spent one or more hours per day to develop themselves.
The conclusion is that a lot of people did not take up continuing
education or training. But among those who did, they did it
vigorously. The top 11% are even spending two or more hours
a day to train themselves to climb up the career ladder through
attending courses, lectures, self-study programmes, or on-the-job
training. Are you one of the top 11%?
Taken from Career Times 2002/02/08
|